← Search

Sarah Cornelius

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Minneapolis, MN
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 39W–29L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history68 matches
W
2025-11-11 · Gould/Kuberski - TuesdayFunTennis · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-10-21 · Gould/Kuberski - TuesdayFunTennis · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-03-10 · Jones/Shemyakin · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Cross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-03-05 · Kuberski/Gould 18+/4.0 (Winter 24) · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-02-18 · Jones/Shemyakin · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Hofeldt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-02-13 · Kuberski/Gould 18+/4.0 (Winter 24) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Reese
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-02-06 · Kuberski/Gould 18+/4.0 (Winter 24) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Jayne Crocker
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-01-30 · Kuberski/Gould 18+/4.0 (Winter 24) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Conrad
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-03-21 · Kortsha/Carlson 18+ W23 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-02-28 · Kortsha/Carlson 18+ W23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa LaCombe
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2023-02-14 · Kortsha/Carlson 18+ W23 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-01-31 · Kortsha/Carlson 18+ W23 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
57.6%
38W–28L · 53.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 43% of the time
#1 Singles
43%
29 matches
#2 Singles
41%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams