← Search

Marcus Liou

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Granada Hills, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 82W–28L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history110 matches
L
2026-10-25 · 4.5 Magnitude/Esguerra-Tan/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Tan
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-19 · 4.5 Magnitude/Esguerra-Tan/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aris Reyes
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-27 · BC-IndependencePark/RafaelHerrera4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Hudson
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
Eduardo Cedeno / Eduardo Cedeno
2026-06-20 · Duffy-Esguerra/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sunny Trinh
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · Duffy-Esguerra/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dhruv Sareen
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · BC-IndependencePark/RafaelHerrera4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Hudson
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-06 · BC-IndependencePark/RafaelHerrera4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gary Gargantos
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · BC-IndependencePark/RafaelHerrera4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gary Gargantos
loading the estimate
6-0, 1-1
L
2026-04-18 · Duffy-Esguerra/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shane Duffy
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-24 · SFV LLW Tennis the Menace/DiFazio-Roknaldin/Balboa · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tegwyn John mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-12-14 · SFV-LLW-Northridge Quakes/M Tan & J Chan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aris Reyes
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-09-28 · SFV-LLW-Northridge Quakes/M Tan & J Chan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shane Duffy
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
87.8%
43W–6L · 62.1% of games
4.5
50%
6W–6L · 47.2% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 62.5% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
3.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 68.9% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 60.9% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
20 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert