← Search

Laura Schenkelberg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Morgan Hill, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
279 matches · 112W–167L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history279 matches
L
2026-08-30 · MORGAN HILL TC CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristie Solomon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-29 · GILROY TENNIS CLUB/GILROY TENNIS CTR 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Chi Truong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · MORGAN HILL TC CW6.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jewel A Knofler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-24 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CW5.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kotim Pak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · RIO DEL MAR 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erik Jertberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · RIO DEL MAR 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Desieyes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · RIO DEL MAR 40MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff McCormac mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · RIO DEL MAR 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erik Jertberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-27 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kotim Pak championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · RIO DEL MAR 40MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pete Kinkead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-14 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Muhn
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kotim Pak
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 53.1% of games
3.0
45.5%
35W–42L · 49.1% of games
3.5
21.2%
14W–52L · 37.8% of games
5.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.1% of games
6.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.5% of games
6.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 50.4% of games
7.0
30%
3W–7L · 42.8% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
40.6%
28W–41L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
116 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
59 matches
#1 Singles
8%
22 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert