← Search

Sheila Breckenridge

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
255 matches · 161W–94L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history255 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Jo.VanCampen40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Dehaven mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-10 · Je.Troch55M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randall Harrill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · Je.Troch55M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffery Troch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Je.VanCampen18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Cox
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · Jo.VanCampen40M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffery Troch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · Je.VanCampen18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Cox
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-02 · Je.Troch55M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffery Troch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · Je.VanCampen18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Hepp
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-13 · Je.Anderson40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julianne Rothert
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-15 · Je.Anderson40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Hepp
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-14 · St.Grose55A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Casadonte
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · La.Cox18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Troch
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
79.4%
27W–7L · 64% of games
3.0
66.2%
51W–26L · 59.2% of games
3.5
49.3%
34W–35L · 49.6% of games
5.5
72.4%
21W–8L · 58% of games
6.5
64.3%
18W–10L · 54.7% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.4% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
68 matches
#2 Singles
7%
17 matches
#3 Singles
6%
14 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert