← Search

Julie Watanabe

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Morgan Hill, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 76W–134L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history210 matches
L
2026-10-25 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Galocy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-24 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Galocy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-10 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elaine Kwok
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-04 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Patti Rottjakob
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-03 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dorina Creel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-29 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elaine Kwok
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-19 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tamara Tarkington
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · MORGAN HILL TC 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Breen
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · MORGAN HILL TC 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Boncher
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · MORGAN HILL TC 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frances Caroline Gardhouse
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · MORGAN HILL TC 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frances Caroline Gardhouse
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-06 · LOS GATOS SR 65AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Roberts
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
33.3%
23W–46L · 44.9% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.3% of games
7.5
44%
22W–28L · 47.4% of games
8.0
45.2%
14W–17L · 47.2% of games
8.5
20%
2W–8L · 39.4% of games
7.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 46.4% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
4W–20L · 35.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
29 matches
#1 Singles
8%
16 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova