← Search

Jan Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Spokane, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 13W–14L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history27 matches
W
2024-03-02 · WCCP-Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Voni Tombari
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-02-16 · WCCP-Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Bond
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-01-28 · WCCP-Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Callie Adams
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-01-20 · WCCP-Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Violette
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-10-22 · WCCP-Love Handles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Stanley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2023-10-21 · WCCP-Love Handles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Stanley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-10-21 · WCCP-Love Handles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Burgess
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
W
2023-10-20 · WCCP-Love Handles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Stanley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
L
2023-10-20 · WCCP-Love Handles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Blykowski-May
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-02-26 · SC-Skittles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Evans
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2021-11-06 · SC-Steiner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirlee Steiner
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-11-05 · SC-Steiner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirlee Steiner
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.8% of games
7.0
40%
4W–6L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
7 matches
#2 Singles
11%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer