Search

Lisa Berger

Spokane, WA
3.5S year-end 2025
51 matches · 24W–27L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
704 of 1209

Lisa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Lisa has gone from the 35th to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 49.8% of games
7.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history51 matches
L
Andrea Valentine / Linda Allen
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Blykowski-May
0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
Lisa Lindholm / Danielle Dunigan
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Blykowski-May
+0.061better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Alyson Gamache / Susan Busch
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Blykowski-May
0.047below expectation — took 37% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Anna Campbell / Becky van Keulen
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Blykowski-May
+0.050better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Kristina Warren / Janet Deandre
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Schafer
0.016below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Nichole Shanley / Jandi Stowell
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Blykowski-May
0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Lisa Violette / Anna Campbell
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Marvel
0.014below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Christine Cattell / Kristi Cotant
2026-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Schafer
0.023below expectation — took 54% of games against 63% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2022-11-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Conway
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Michelle Jordan / Tami Socolofsky
2022-11-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicole Floyd
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-3
W
2022-10-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Conway
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-6, 7-6
W
2022-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Ramsey
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.