Sandee Kozel
Naples, FL
126 matches · 95W–31L · seasons 2023–2026
Captains: add Sandee Kozel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history126 matches
W
Massae Sato MacIunas / Marianne Saibara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Kimberlie Bayne / Sherilyn Rawlings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Carly Reese / Amber Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Tiffany Pierce / Shauna Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Catherine Bliss / Gretchen Soffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Amy Hampton / Krysia Leason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Merri Gillespie / Simone McInnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2023–2026
COLLIER/Becker
COLLIER/Gardner
COLLIER/Marchand
Fall Winners/Riverstone / Marchand
Florida/Marchand/40&Over8.0XD
Naples Bay Club /
PC MARC Greenhalgh-Brooks
PC MARC-Leigh/Killian
Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks
Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks
Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks
Park City Summer Girls
Sterling Oaks / Gardner
Sterling Oaks /Gardner
Winter Winners/ Sanchez Casal/ Gardner
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
82.1%
55W–12L · 62.8% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
70%
14W–6L · 57.9% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 62.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
25 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.