← Search

Tami Scribner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Scottsdale, AZ
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
13 matches · 6W–7L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history13 matches
W
2025-12-15 · 7.0 GEP Golden girls W70F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Lupien
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-11-24 · 7.0 GEP Golden girls W70F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Lupien
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-17 · 7.0 GEP Golden girls W70F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lomen
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-12-16 · 7.0 GEP Golden Eagles W70F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Peppo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-12-02 · 7.0 GEP Golden Eagles W70F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Peppo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-03-17 · Spr Win 7.0 GEPark HallWerz W65S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Werzynski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2022-02-09 · 8.0 ISP Peebles W65S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Eppers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2022-02-02 · 8.0 ISP Peebles W65S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with SuLan Peebles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2022-01-06 · 7.0 GEP HallWerz W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Werzynski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2021-12-16 · 7.0 GEP HallWerz W65F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Werzynski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2021-12-09 · 7.0 GEP HallWerz W65F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Lupien
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2021-12-02 · 7.0 GEP HallWerz W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lomen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.5% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 62% of the time
#3 Doubles
62%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King