← Search

Susan Cox

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Amarillo, TX
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 23W–33L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history56 matches
L
2025-04-17 · Haggard · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Boyce
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-26 · Haggard · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudia Aragon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-04-25 · Haggard · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorraine Haggard
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-04-22 · Ollinger · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine Haggard
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-01 · Ollinger · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melody Garrido
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-04-13 · Haggard · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shanna Piatt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-04-06 · Haggard · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitzi Mayfield
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-08-09 · Moeller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aaron Schrick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2022-05-02 · Ollinger · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine Haggard
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-04-25 · Ollinger · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2022-04-14 · Haggard · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitzi Mayfield
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2022-04-11 · Ollinger · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Chavez
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.5% of games
3.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 47.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 42.8% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 28.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova