← Search

Debra Miller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
E Wenatchee, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 13W–18L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history31 matches
L
2026-10-17 · WRAC-WRAC1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Carlson
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-17 · WRAC-WRAC1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Woodward
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-16 · WRAC-WRAC1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Carlson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-18 · WRAC-WRAC1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with KIMBERLY HABICH
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-17 · WRAC-WRAC1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-10-26 · WRAC-WRAC1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with J Colleen Berry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-10-26 · WRAC-WRAC1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-25 · WRAC-WRAC1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
W
2023-10-22 · WRAC-1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with KIMBERLY HABICH
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
W
2023-10-21 · WRAC-1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with KIMBERLY HABICH
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
W
2023-10-21 · WRAC-1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with KIMBERLY HABICH
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
L
2023-10-20 · WRAC-1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.4% of games
7.0
41.7%
10W–14L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert