← Search

Kaye Mede

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 96W–142L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history238 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Hempfield - No Faults Given (Culp) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tomo Carson
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-30 · Hempfield - No Faults Given (Culp) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Miller
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-10-15 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tomo Carson
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-10 · Hempfield - FB Baumer · #3 Doubles · with Jay Rosenthal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-10-07 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tomo Carson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-30 · Hempfield - Broskey 70s · #3 Doubles · with Martha Furness
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-29 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Loke
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Weaver championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-09-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Bernhard championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-10 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Woods-Kelly
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-19 · Hempfield - Broskey 70s · #3 Doubles · with Linda Barosh
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tomo Carson
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 52.5% of games
3.0
15.7%
8W–43L · 33.7% of games
5.0
40%
6W–9L · 48.7% of games
6.0
39.5%
34W–52L · 45.1% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
54.9%
28W–23L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
53 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe