← Search

Sheryl Norman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lakeland, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 57W–67L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history124 matches
W
2026-10-20 · Lakeland LYC 3.0s/Campisi · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Brandy Lansford
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6
L
2026-10-06 · Lakeland LYC 3.0s/Campisi · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Brandy Lansford
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Default
2026-09-29 · Lakeland LYC 3.0s/Campisi · #4 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Hilary Crenshaw
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-22 · Lakeland LYC 3.0s/Campisi · #4 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Ginny Houghton
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-15 · Lakeland LYC 3.0s/Campisi · #4 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Cayley Miles
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-09-08 · Lakeland LYC 3.0s/Campisi · #5 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kim Daniels
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · Lakeland Country Club/ Clark · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruthie Tait
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · Lakeland Country Club/ Clark · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruthie Tait
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · Lakeland Country Club/ Campisi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaimi Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · Lakeland Country Club/ Campisi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Paul
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-12 · Lakeland Country Club/ Campisi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaimi Miller
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-28 · Lakeland Country Club/ Campisi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaimi Miller
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
54.5%
24W–20L · 51.5% of games
3.0
41.7%
25W–35L · 46.3% of games
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.1% of games
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
25%
2W–6L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#2 Female Doubles
7%
9 matches
#3 Female Doubles
7%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer