← Search

Carol Bowers

— year-end
26 matches · 6W–20L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Carol Bowers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2021-08-19 · Hempfield - Rasmuson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2021-08-16 · Hempfield - Rasmuson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Barley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2021-08-09 · Hempfield - Rasmuson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2021-07-06 · Hempfield - Rasmuson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Hackman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2021-05-11 · Hempfield - Rasmuson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Barley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2019-11-08 · Hempfield - Red · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Randolph Andrews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2019-10-18 · Hempfield - Red · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clayton Bubeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2019-08-12 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
Julie Bond / Roberta Brummel
2019-08-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Mullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2019-07-29 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2019-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martel Maguire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2019-07-15 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
Teams4 teams · 2020–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 43% of games
6.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 34.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
6 matches
#2 Singles
15%
4 matches
#1 Singles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams