Search

Mike Brooks

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
116 matches · 57W–59L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.37
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
95%
stay 3.5
5%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.32. Lower than today’s 3.37 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
83 of 256
WA · 3.5
370 of 1209

Mike is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Mike has gone from the 30th to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
63.4%
26W–15L · 55.7% of games
8.0
25%
3W–9L · 47.4% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
48.9%
23W–24L · 52.2% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history116 matches
L
Jeffrey Medzegian / Thomas MacDonald
2026-04-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Sloan
0.057below expectation — took 45% of games against 65% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Roosen
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Jeremy Zucker / Lucille Zapfmixed
2026-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Detje Marcel
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Brian Scullion / Bradley Dworkin
2026-03-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Morton
0.004better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Jill Delaney / Cesar Vallejomixed
2026-03-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Charron
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Charles Strazzara / James Morris
2026-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Jones
+0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Gregory Smith / Barry Hackshaw
2026-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Goldade
0.007about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Randy Grotem / Ricardo Molato
2026-02-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Goldade
0.005about as expected — took 58% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Randy Haemmerle / Christianne Ritcheymixed
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Jones
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Kathryn Kuzemchuk / Ed Boothmixed
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Jones
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Sorin Alexanian / William Eir
2026-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Tilford
+0.025better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Hector Calderon / Alex Castanon
2026-02-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Sloan
+0.077better than expected — took 92% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.