← Search

Nanette Campbell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Edmond, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 30W–50L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history80 matches
L
2026-05-28 · Smash+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rouye Choquette
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-30 · Smash+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Goetz
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-23 · Smash+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathie Strickler
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-09 · Smash+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Mansell
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-08 · Smash+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jan Foisy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-17 · Smash+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cara Hogan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-10 · Smash+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Traci Grant
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-11 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Taylor
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-25 · Servivors · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Dirickson
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-13 · Smash+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Navarro
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-05-30 · Smash+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Goetz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-05-09 · Smash+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Mansell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
39.5%
17W–26L · 50.1% of games
7.0
35.1%
13W–24L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe