← Search

Jennifer Witt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CRANSTON, RI
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 23W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history86 matches
L
2026-08-22 · FC: Team Jennis/Donnelly · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Coulombe championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · FC: Team Jennis/Donnelly · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Pryor
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · FC: Team Jennis/Donnelly · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Pryor
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-2
L
2026-06-26 · FC: Team Jennis/Donnelly · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Coulombe
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · FC: Team Jennis/Donnelly · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Clayburgh
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-04-26 · RP: Witt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Allard mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-5
L
2024-03-23 · RP: Witt · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Baalbaki mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-03-16 · RP: Curry/DePalma · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Diehl mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-2, 3-5
W
2024-02-10 · RP: Witt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Luca mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 3-1
L
2024-02-05 · RP: Curry/DePalma · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Carpenter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-01-13 · RP: Witt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Allard mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-01-06 · RP: Witt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Baalbaki mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
37.9%
11W–18L · 46.8% of games
4.0
15%
3W–17L · 41.1% of games
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.7% of games
8.0mixed
20.8%
5W–19L · 38% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe