← Search

Beth Burns

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lakewood, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 12W–17L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history29 matches
L
2025-06-18 · CK GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Reed
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-04 · CK GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda McMahan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-05-28 · CK GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Reed
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-14 · CK GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Reed
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2022-05-11 · CK RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katherine Phillips
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-04-27 · CK RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Reed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2021-06-23 · CK RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Reed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
2021-06-16 · CK RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Reed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2021-06-09 · CK RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Courtney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2021-05-26 · CK RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Reed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2021-05-19 · CK RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Reed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2020-08-05 · CK RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Reed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
3.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 44.6% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal