← Search

Debbie Eglseder

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Omaha, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 24W–24L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history48 matches
W
2025-07-09 · Mellen/Petersen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Riggert
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-06-18 · Mellen/Petersen · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-11 · Mellen/Petersen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Slone
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-09 · Cassels · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Peterson
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-04 · Mellen/Petersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Murphy
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-02 · Cassels · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Kubat
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-28 · Mellen/Petersen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Murphy
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2024-06-29 · Cassels · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Connealy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-06-08 · Cassels · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Peterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-06-01 · Cassels · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Morrissey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-28 · Peterson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Morrissey
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-17 · Tanis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Peterson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
16W–16L · 48.4% of games
7.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe