← Search

Deborah Kylander

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Duxbury, MA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 64W–57L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history121 matches
L
2026-07-14 · KIG:Kingsbury:Drago/O’Brien · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cinnie OBrien
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · KIG:Kingsbury:Drago/O’Brien · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Goodman-Simeone
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-4, 0-1
W
Default
2026-06-16 · KIG:Kingsbury:Drago/O’Brien · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Goodman-Simeone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-09 · LAK:Lakeville:Cerro/Brayton · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Schelleng
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · LAK:Lakeville:Cerro/Brayton · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Schelleng
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · KIG:Kingsbury:Drago/O’Brien · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Goodman-Simeone
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-16 · KIG:Kingsbury:Kylander · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonya Rubin
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-14 · KIG:Kingsbury Club:Lamberti/Gilbert · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Gleason mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-11-09 · KIG:Kingsbury:Kylander · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Mongello
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-11-02 · KIG:Kingsbury:Kylander · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Bartlett
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-19 · KIG:Kingsbury:Kylander · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Farquharson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-5
W
2025-10-10 · KIG:Kingsbury Club:Lamberti/Gilbert · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Gleason mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
62.3%
43W–26L · 54.7% of games
4.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.2% of games
8.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
12W–15L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe