← Search

Nanette Carpenter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Middlebury, VT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 6W–6L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history12 matches
W
2026-06-21 · MIT:Senioritas:Bark · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janis Bark
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-05-31 · MIT:Senioritas:Bark · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heather Potter
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · MIT:Senioritas:Bark · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rene Saenger
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-07 · MIT:The Courtiers:Repka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Repka
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-31 · MIT:The Courtiers:Repka · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vivianne Ivanier
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-05-10 · MIT:The Courtiers:Repka · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara McClallen
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-06-01 · MIT:Middlebury Courtiers:Lourie/Carpenter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cinny Lawrence
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-19 · MIT:Middlebury Courtiers:Lourie/Carpenter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Marshall
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2019-06-02 · MIT/Eat Play Love-Carpenter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Clement
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2019-05-19 · MIT/Eat Play Love-Carpenter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Clement
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2019-05-05 · MIT/Eat Play Love-Carpenter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cinny Lawrence
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2019-04-14 · MIT/Eat Play Love-Carpenter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Lyons
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.3% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova