← Search

Michelle Mileski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Green Bay, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 56W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history98 matches
L
2026-10-30 · 2026 WI Combo Mixed 6.5 X NEL Western Jonen · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patrick Mileski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-08 · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women Western Williams · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Bachmann
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-18 · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women Western Williams · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ana Nguyen-DelMoral
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-11 · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women Western Williams · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Czyz Klemens
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-09 · WI Adult 18&Over 3.5 Women NEL Western Butrym · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Collard championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-09 · WI Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women Western Collard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Schneider championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-08 · WI Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women Western Collard · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Czyz Klemens championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women Western Williams · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila Butrym
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women Western Williams · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Czyz Klemens
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · WI Adult 18&Over 3.5 Women NEL Western Butrym · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Halron
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-20 · WI Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women Western Collard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Butrym
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · WI Adult 18&Over 3.5 Women NEL Western Butrym · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Schneider
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
74.4%
32W–11L · 60.7% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.1% of games
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 62% of games
7.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 60.6% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 49% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer