← Search

Megan Owen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Chester, OH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 14W–8L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history22 matches
L
2026-03-03 · Queen City Santos · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bethe Orlando
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-24 · Queen City Santos · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Ahrens
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-24 · Queen City Miller · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bonnie Lang
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-27 · Queen City Miller · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Beth King
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-20 · Queen City Miller · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Wendy Weil
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-06-06 · Queen City Orange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terry Shick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-1
W
2024-05-30 · Queen City Orange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terry Shick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
L
2022-07-13 · Queen City Blue · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Cooper
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2022-06-29 · Queen City Blue · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erica Fastnacht
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2022-06-08 · Queen City Blue · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Cooper
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 3-1
W
2021-06-02 · Queen City Blue · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chrissy Buckingham
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2021-05-19 · Queen City Blue · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pamela Wise
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 51.6% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
1 match
#4 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal