← Search

Laurence Isaacs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 49W–92L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history141 matches
L
2026-09-26 · JLundberg-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with John Pelphrey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-19 · JLundberg-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Raymond Xu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-30 · CMoffitt.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with NIKHIL PASULA
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-29 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Luc Sanchez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-22 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ryan Sayko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-21 · CMoffitt.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with NIKHIL PASULA
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-15 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Raymond Xu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · CMoffitt.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Richard Millard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · JLundberg-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stewart Bible
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-28 · RGoff-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sameer Cheema
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · RGoff-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Mansfield
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-30 · RGoff-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Green
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
42.9%
21W–28L · 48% of games
4.5
28.1%
9W–23L · 39.9% of games
7.5
50%
6W–6L · 51.4% of games
8.5
22.9%
8W–27L · 42.9% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
32 matches
#3 Singles
8%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe