← Search

Kim Brooks

— year-end
39 matches · 29W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Kim Brooks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-09-03 · UPTA40C/Kohl/Riverside · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heather Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · SATL40/NBerry/Beech Springs · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Birch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Deborah Roberts / Chelle Kelaher
2026-08-27 · UPTA40C/Kohl/Riverside · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cristina Koehler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-19 · SATL40/NBerry/Beech Springs · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Birch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-13 · UPTA40C/Kohl/Riverside · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heather Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · SATL40/NBerry/Beech Springs · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Birch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · UPTA40M/Lane/Riverside · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Lawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · UPTA40M/Lane/Riverside · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jose Javier Solis Lopez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · UPTA40M/Lane/Riverside · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Lawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · UPTA40M/Lane/Riverside · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Lawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-12 · UPTA40M/Lane/Riverside · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Lawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
Amy White / Rhonda Watson
2026-04-18 · FTA40A/Riverwalk/Yarborough · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robyn Yarborough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
94.1%
16W–1L · 69.4% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59% of games
8.5
100%
5W–0L · 68.5% of games
4.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
9 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer