← Search

Stuart Cornwell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lafayette, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 33W–17L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history50 matches
W
2026-04-02 · Vining/55 4.0M/OCC/LFT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Morris Belaire
loading the estimate
8-6
W
2026-04-02 · Vining/55 4.0M/OCC/LFT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Lee
loading the estimate
8-6
W
2025-08-03 · Searle/55/4.0/MX/BVR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eileen Fruge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-05-20 · Vining/40/4.0/MX/OCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Briley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-13 · Vining/40/4.0/MX/OCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corina Melancon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-09 · Vining/55/4.0/OCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Jordan
loading the estimate
8-6
W
2025-03-01 · Vining/55/4.0/OCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Jordan
loading the estimate
8-3
L
2024-08-12 · Searle/55/4.0/MX/OCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corina Melancon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-8
W
2024-08-07 · Vining/40/4.0/MX/OCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Schwing mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-2
L
2024-08-01 · Searle/55/4.0/MX/OCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth Larimer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-8
L
2024-07-16 · Vining/40/4.0/MX/OCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth Larimer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2023-03-16 · Vining : OCC : Lafayette · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Breaux Sr
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 56.8% of games
8.5
75%
9W–3L · 57.2% of games
4.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 41.2% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova