← Search

Braden Robinson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shreveport, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 97W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history139 matches
L
2026-09-30 · Geneux/40/8.5/CM/POTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stevie Schmidt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-23 · Geneux/40/8.5/CM/POTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stevie Schmidt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · Geneux/40/8.5/CM/POTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stevie Schmidt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · Stuart/40/3-3.5-4/TM/POTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Young
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-23 · Stuart/40/3-3.5-4/TM/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Young
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-02 · Stuart/40/3-3.5-4/TM/POTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Young
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-18 · Stuart/40/3-3.5-4/TM/POTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Young
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Triche championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Whitman championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Triche championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Whitman championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Triche championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
80.5%
62W–15L · 60.4% of games
4.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.7% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.2% of games
8.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 50.7% of games
4.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert