← Search

Caty Garside

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Columbia, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 156W–57L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history213 matches
L
2026-10-30 · CTL40/McCorkle/CTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taje Davis
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-15 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taje Davis
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-10-14 · CTL40/McCorkle/CTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Brown
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-09 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Peterson
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-19 · #2 Doubles · with Lynne Mizzell
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · with Kathryn Sandifer
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · with Shannon Peterson
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-10 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Wiseman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-27 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Olsgaard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-05 · CTL40/Haskell/CTC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Haskell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · CTL40/Haskell/CTC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Plyler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Wiseman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
33W–11L · 62.2% of games
4.0
68.1%
62W–29L · 56.3% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.4% of games
7.5
83.7%
36W–7L · 65.1% of games
8.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 57.6% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
41 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer