← Search

Rachel Baumgartner

Scottsdale, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
113 matches · 51W–62L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Rachel sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Rachel is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachel has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Rachel has gone from the 11th to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
42.9%
33W–44L · 47.4% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.2% of games
8.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 53.1% of games
8.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 35.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history113 matches
W
Hannah Kaufman / Hiliary Shurtz
2025-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Clark
+0.022better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Megan Miller / Charlotte Golla
2025-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Myers
+0.018better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Martha Mckeand / Akiko Mitchell
2025-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Harris
+0.037better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Marci Saucier / Rachel Scheinerman
2025-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Myers
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Katherine Baker / Patty Juhl
2025-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Clark
−0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Araceli Marin / Denise Phillips
2025-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Harris
+0.025better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Miranda Edwards / Nancy Bates
2025-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Grote
−0.018below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
Joan Simondet / Susanne Hogan
2025-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Harris
−0.050below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Katie Raczynski / Lisa Warriner
2025-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Gran
−0.035below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Lucy Marshall / Kirstie Ransco
2025-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Campbell
−0.023below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Carmen Walker / Sohee Chung
2024-12-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Becky Flander
+0.030better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Linda Biddle / Chris Linderson
2024-12-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Harris
−0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.