← Search

Scott Martin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Collins, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 26W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history42 matches
W
2026-07-31 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Rose
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jas Dhaliwal
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-17 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shane Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-12 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ernest Chavez
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-05 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ernest Chavez
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · CSU GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Gidcumb
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-08 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Woodmansee
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-15 · CSU WHITE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ernest Chavez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-08-01 · CSU WHITE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Keefe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-25 · CSU WHITE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ernest Chavez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-13 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Maurier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-11 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Maurier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 59.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 28.6% of games
7.0
76%
19W–6L · 57.5% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe