← Search

Taylor Janos

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Woodstock, GA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
4 matches · 3W–1L · seasons 2024–2024
Match history4 matches
W
2024-06-30 · Cherokee/Jona Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorothea Bricka
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2024-06-23 · Cherokee/Jona Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MacKenzi Leigh
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
Evelyn Stevens / Tracy Whitmore
2024-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Smail
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
Jane Foy / Mary Guiney
2023-11-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Janos
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
50%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova