← Search

Melissa Pine

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Petersburg, FL
5.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 15W–8L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history23 matches
W
Default
2026-07-12 · HILLS/Bruning · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Natalie Paiva
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · HILLS/Bruning · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Katie Koperski
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · HILLS/Bruning · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Katie Koperski
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-13 · Hills/Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Erin Bryce
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-29 · Hills/Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Natalie Paiva
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-0
L
2024-08-18 · Hills/Lund-Paiva/18&Over5.0W · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Merissa Rock championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-08-17 · Hills/Lund-Paiva/18&Over5.0W · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Beatrice Few championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-07-28 · Hills/Lund-Paiva/18&Over5.0W · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Melissa Mackey
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-06-30 · Hills/Lund-Paiva/18&Over5.0W · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Beatrice Few
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-06-02 · Hills/Lund-Paiva/18&Over5.0W · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Beatrice Few
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-10-22 · HCC - D. Agnew · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Christine Rondeau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-09-17 · HCC - D. Agnew · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Lisa Ross
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
60%
9W–6L · 57.3% of games
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 51.9% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova