← Search

Julie Allen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Paradise Valley, AZ
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
31 matches · 25W–6L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history31 matches
W
2026-09-25 · 4.0 AZCC1 Zup W18Fam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Ethier
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-03-19 · 8.0 AZCC BiceSmith X40S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Travis Bice mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2023-02-12 · 8.0 AZCC BiceSmith X40S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Stein mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
2023-02-05 · 8.0 AZCC BiceSmith X40S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Travis Bice mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
2022-12-17 · PHX/BiceSmith/40XOver/8.0X · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Stein mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-10-02 · PHX/BiceSmith/40XOver/8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Stein mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-04-10 · 8.0 AZCC SmithBice X40S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heyward McAlpin mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-7
L
2022-02-06 · 8.0 AZCC SmithBice X40S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Travis Bice mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2022-01-30 · 8.0 AZCC SmithBice X40S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heyward McAlpin mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
L
2021-11-21 · 8.0 AZCC BiceSmith X40F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jake Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
L
2021-10-31 · 8.0 AZCC BiceSmith X40F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Travis Bice mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2021-10-17 · 8.0 AZCC BiceSmith X40F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Travis Bice mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
89.5%
17W–2L · 66.7% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams