Search

Tracy Bardell

EL PRADO, NM
0.0 year-end
47 matches · 24W–23L · seasons 20192020
Where Tracy sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Tracy is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tracy has been a steady 4.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
60%
6W–4L · 57.9% of games
4.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 37.2% of games
8.0
100%
8W–0L · 74.2% of games
9.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.9% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
L
2020-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Hendrickson
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Michelle Ly / June Wu
2020-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Lyon
0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Regan Reichle / Boon Yon Joung
2020-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Lyon
0.054below expectation — took 53% of games against 71% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Marie Picard / Amy Jeanchamps
2019-12-07 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Lyon
0.005about as expected — took 65% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2019-11-24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Lyon
+0.013better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2019-11-10 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Lyon
+0.059better than expected — took 75% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Liz Melville / Janet Deandre
2019-10-27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Clement
+0.046better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Susan Servick / Lea Williams
2019-10-27 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Seatter
+0.077better than expected — took 92% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Sheryl Traum / Merilee Dinneen
2019-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Seatter
+0.056better than expected — took 71% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Kerry Spajic / Leslie Inman
2019-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Budnick
+0.067better than expected — took 71% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Cyd Bothum / Rebecca Gardner
2019-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elda Nelson
+0.070better than expected — took 75% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2019-10-20 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Elliott
+0.048better than expected — took 46% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.