← Search

Andrea McCartney

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
311 matches · 185W–126L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history311 matches
W
2026-10-05 · Ta.LeFevre55C7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Barbara Gillespie
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Werner championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-09-14 · Ta.LeFevre55C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Dougherty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-01 · Me.Liner18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leslie Corn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-28 · Me.Liner40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susie EL-Kaissi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-24 · Ta.LeFevre55C7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Dougherty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-18 · Me.Liner18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sherry Ingle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Ja.Liner18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Arra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Je.Monaghen55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Monaghen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · Ta.LeFevre55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Werner
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Ma.Slaymaker18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Carlin
loading the estimate
4-4
L
2026-07-13 · Ja.Liner18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Arra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 69.1% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
63.6%
91W–52L · 54.1% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.7% of games
7.5
63.3%
57W–33L · 55.6% of games
8.5
41.2%
14W–20L · 50.2% of games
4.0mixed
66.7%
12W–6L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
132 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
86 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer