← Search

Ricky Bearden

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mandeville, LA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 39W–61L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history100 matches
W
2026-08-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Bearden mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Bearden mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-03 · Johnston/55s/3.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Bearden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Johnston/55s/3.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Bearden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-03 · Johnston/55s/3.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Bearden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charles Monteiro championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Gillane championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Berry championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-11 · Johnston- 55/3.0/M/Stonecreek · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with BenF Brown
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-01-28 · Johnston- 55/3.0/M/Stonecreek · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renan Esquivel
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-24 · Johnston- 55/3.0/M/Stonecreek · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Johnston
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-04 · Miller 55/6.5/M/Francos · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Munoz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
32.3%
10W–21L · 44.1% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.6% of games
6.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 42.1% of games
3.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 43.6% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 48.9% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe