← Search

Erin Fisher

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charleston, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 63W–47L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history110 matches
W
2026-11-02 · LCTA39/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Crivella
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-28 · LCTA18/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Tonelis
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-10-18 · LCTA39/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Dempsey
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-10-11 · LCTA39/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Schuster
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-01 · LCTA18/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Crivella
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-09-27 · LCTA39/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Klos
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-20 · LCTA39/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Nehez Wingard
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · LCTA18/Finneyfrock/StAndrews · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Clarke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · LCTA18/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Tonelis
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-05 · LCTA18/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Nehez Wingard
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Klos championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-08 · LCTA18/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Nehez Wingard
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
60%
27W–18L · 58.8% of games
3.5
58%
29W–21L · 52.1% of games
6.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
36 matches
#1 Singles
26%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert