← Search

Gabriela Marrero-Martinez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ponce, PR
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
48 matches · 33W–15L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history48 matches
W
2026-07-08 · Encantada - Mia Valcarcel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fabiana Pineda championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · Encantada - Mia Valcarcel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Morales
loading the estimate
0-1
W
2026-06-20 · Encantada - Mia Valcarcel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalia Rosas
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · Encantada - Mia Valcarcel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kayra Calcano Nieves
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · Encantada - Mia Valcarcel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gabriella Gracia
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · Encantada - Mia Valcarcel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mia Valcarcel Torres
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · Encantada - Mia Valcarcel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ariana Soto Mendoza
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Encantada - Mia Valcarcel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fabiana Pineda
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-03-21 · Guayama Glenda · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacobo Vazquez mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-02-16 · Guayama Glenda · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacobo Vazquez mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 58.9% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.6% of games
6.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 60.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#2 Singles
13%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert