Search

Paul Joncich

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
159 matches · 95W–64L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
97%
stay 4.0
3%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.80. Lower than today’s 3.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 4.0
6 of 49
NV · 4.0
28 of 203

Paul is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Paul has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Paul has gone from the 28th to the 94th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
62.8%
49W–29L · 56.9% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 40.1% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
71.4%
35W–14L · 59.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history159 matches
W
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Dragnev
0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Stephen Spelman / Donnis Willis
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Girmus
0.007better than expected — took 80% of games against 72% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Larry Malinowski / Mike Noble
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Dragnev
+0.039better than expected — took 86% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Mark Smith / David Morgan
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Hou
0.034below expectation — took 38% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Dmitriy Kosyagin / Andrew Chong
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Luna
0.029below expectation — took 41% of games against 54% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Mike Little / Jim Ray
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Dragnev
+0.027better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Bryan Kyle / Robert Kinas
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph DeMilliano
+0.044better than expected — took 83% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 4-0
W
William Silbey / Michael Springer
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Dragnev
+0.016better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Robert Kraut / Mark Tetzlaff
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Morgan
+0.053better than expected — took 100% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Mike Little / Jim Ray
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph DeMilliano
0.004about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Donnis Willis / Royce Bunag
2026-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Willie Ayon
+0.028better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Daniel Dragnev / Joseph DeMilliano
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Hou
0.042below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.