← Search

Ruth Bates

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Chesterfield, VA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 32W–136L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history168 matches
W
2026-10-25 · MAC - Haynes · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Todd Manning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
Default
2026-10-18 · MAC - Haynes · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Paul Haynes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-10 · MAC Mavericks Bates · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Ward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-4
W
2026-09-27 · MAC - Haynes · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Todd Manning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · MAC Maniacs Bates · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kellie Samson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · Mid-Atlantic/Haynes/55&Over6.0X · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Ward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-2
L
2026-07-29 · MAC Maniacs Bates · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kellie Samson
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · Mid-Atlantic/Haynes/55&Over6.0X · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Manning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
Default
2026-07-25 · Belmont Breakers - Bates · #1 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-20 · Belmont Breakers - Bates · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maegan Deibler
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Mid-Atlantic/Haynes/55&Over6.0X · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Ward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · Belmont Breakers - Bates · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susanna Dodd
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 36.4% of games
3.0
14.3%
7W–42L · 33.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 14.3% of games
6.0
40%
4W–6L · 42.3% of games
6.5
6.2%
1W–15L · 25.3% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.1% of games
6.0mixed
34.6%
9W–17L · 41.7% of games
6.5mixed
5.9%
1W–16L · 25.9% of games
7.0mixed
13.6%
3W–19L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
25 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert