← Search

Amy Oberholtzer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Haddonfield, NJ
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
62 matches · 30W–32L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history62 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Green Valley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Sztejman
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · Green Valley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Sztejman
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · Green Valley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Sztejman
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · Green Valley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Adornetto
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-20 · Green Valley · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Sztejman
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Siena Cerra
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracie Chambers
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Phoebe Figland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Phoebe Figland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-03-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Oberholtzer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-02-18 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Oberholtzer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-01-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Oberholtzer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
50%
3W–3L · 53.3% of games
3.5
75%
15W–5L · 61% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 26.8% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
41.7%
10W–14L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 69% of the time
#1 Doubles
69%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal