← Search

Hao Truong

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Arcadia, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
191 matches · 94W–97L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history191 matches
L
2026-10-25 · SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SU10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacky Lin
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
Default
2026-10-24 · SGV Dare Doubles-YEH-WN/SA10 · #3 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-18 · SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SU10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darren Wong
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-10 · SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SU10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adrian Godjali
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-27 · SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SU10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Kevanian championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-26 · SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SU10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Ko
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-26 · SGV Dare Doubles-YEH-WN/SA10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Trouble Maker-Lee-WN/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gary Kevanian
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SU10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Ko
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-13 · SGV Trouble Makers-Kan-WN/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ben Lu
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-23 · SGV Trouble Makers-Kan-WN/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ben Lu
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-16 · SGV Trouble Makers-Kan-WN/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keane Tarrosa
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 42.9% of games
4.0
53.8%
42W–36L · 49.7% of games
4.5
12.5%
3W–21L · 37.4% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.6% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 57.5% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
20W–10L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 51.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
43 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert