← Search

Sandra Rose

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Canaan, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 95W–131L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history226 matches
L
2026-09-19 · 4S:Honey Deuces:Conklin/Haddad · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Denis championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-18 · 4S:Honey Deuces:Conklin/Haddad · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Haddad championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · 4S:Honey Deuces:Conklin/Haddad · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzanne Lefebvre
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-27 · NC:Sets in the City:Gallagher/Rose · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trish Lewis
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-3
L
2026-06-25 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Flanagan
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · 4S:Honey Deuces:Conklin/Haddad · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Haddad
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-17 · 4S:Honey Deuces:Conklin/Haddad · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Murdock
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Mallon
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · NC:Sets in the City:Gallagher/Rose · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trish Lewis
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · SOL:Mixology:Rose/Guzzetti · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Perez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · 4S:Honey Deuces:Conklin/Haddad · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Haddad
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
54.1%
40W–34L · 52.1% of games
3.5
22.9%
16W–54L · 39.4% of games
6.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 53.8% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 56.3% of games
7.0mixed
35.7%
15W–27L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
34 matches
#1 Singles
14%
31 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal