← Search

Amber Heineman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MISSION, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 49W–105L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history154 matches
L
Jennifer Carpenter / Amber Gonzalez
2026-11-01 · Valdez, Kelli · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phoebe Davenport
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
Vanessa Connell / Amber Gonzalez
2026-10-30 · Valdez, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keri Mooers
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
Vanessa Connell / Amber Gonzalez
2026-10-25 · Valdez, Kelli · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Hope
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-5, 0-1
L
Amber Gonzalez / Vanessa Watkins
2026-10-23 · Valdez, Kelli · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Snodgrass
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-09 · Chiao, Denise · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keri Evans
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-3, 0-1
L
Amber Gonzalez / Abby Kor
2026-08-30 · Duba, Erin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Merritt
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-26 · Chiao, Denise · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelley O'Brien
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · Duba, Erin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Griffin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-19 · Chiao, Denise · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelley O'Brien
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Duba, Erin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abby Kor
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · Duba, Erin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Griffin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · Duba, Erin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tennille Adkins
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.5% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 39.8% of games
4.0
43.9%
36W–46L · 48.3% of games
4.5
0%
0W–31L · 33.9% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 49% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams