← Search

Pam Foland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CARY, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 16W–17L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history33 matches
W
2026-09-29 · PW.Stylski · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lysa Stylski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-22 · PW.Stylski · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ruthann Gray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-08 · PW.Stylski · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with June Plotkin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-25 · PW.Stylski · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margo Stutesman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-18 · PW.Stylski · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carole Bobby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · PW.Stylski · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ruthann Gray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · PW.Stylski · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brenda MacLean
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-26 · PW.Stylski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Micha Federico
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-12 · PW.Stylski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda MacLean
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-04-24 · PW.Stylski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Allen
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-10 · PW.Stylski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Smith
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-27 · PW.Stylski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosalind Manning
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 48.4% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.4% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#1 Singles
24%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova