← Search

Vivian Marley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 117W–106L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history223 matches
W
2026-10-30 · #3 Doubles · with Kaci Kehrt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-17 · LIB-Marley 3.5W Fall Singles F1 · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-16 · #3 Doubles · with Debbie Rademacher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Default
2026-10-09 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kaci Kehrt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-13 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brigid Quint
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-10 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Bae
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hisae Yoshihara
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hisae Yoshihara
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Bullock
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · VTC-Haessler (indoor) 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Skochelak
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brigid Quint
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brigid Quint
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams94 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.6% of games
3.5
54.4%
43W–36L · 50.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 35.1% of games
6.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 62.8% of games
7.0
49.1%
26W–27L · 49.1% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
59.3%
16W–11L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
54 matches
#3 Singles
9%
21 matches
Singles
8%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert