← Search

Mark Peterson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alamo, CA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 13W–34L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history47 matches
L
2026-10-28 · CHABOT CANYON 55MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Abby Dawkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-12 · CHABOT CANYON 55MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Heinze mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-15 · CHABOT CANYON 40MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Bruggeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · CHABOT CANYON 40MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Arielle Chu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · CHABOT CANYON 40MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Grace Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-20 · CHABOT CANYON 18AM3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Baxter Bell
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · CHABOT CANYON 18AM3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregor Mcnabb
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-02-22 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0B · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaveh Moraghebi
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-21 · CHABOT CANYON 18MX6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Gambatese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-14 · CHABOT CANYON 18MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shirin Belur mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-15 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0B · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bret Baker
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-29 · CHABOT CANYON 55MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kitty Neumark mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 45.6% of games
5.5
20%
1W–4L · 40% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 39.7% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 57% of the time
#3 Doubles
57%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe