← Search

Amy Crossed

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 58W–45L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history103 matches
L
Keegan Fisher / Leah Gordon
2026-08-24 · TCR: Ortiz · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Allison O'Malley
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-11 · I got it · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neerja Bhatnagar
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · TCR: Ortiz · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Wendy Gladstone-Brown
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Mandy Newell / Abigail Runner
2026-07-24 · TCR: Gladstone-Brown · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Jane Mulvehill
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · I got it · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Thurnherr
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-20 · TCR: Ortiz · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Shelby George
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Served with Sass · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Donahue
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
Courtney Cornell / Joan O'Byrne
2026-06-19 · TCR: Gladstone-Brown · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Rita Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · Served with Sass · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with JODIE BORLAUG
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
Kimberly Cufari Chin / Keegan Fisher
2026-06-15 · TCR: Ortiz · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Deborah DeCicco
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-10 · Served with Sass · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Vindigni
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-09 · Served with Sass · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judy Zhan
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
56%
14W–11L · 48.4% of games
3.0
73.2%
30W–11L · 59.5% of games
3.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 39.8% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#2 Female Doubles
10%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
8%
8 matches
#3 Female Doubles
7%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer