← Search

Mary Church

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
317 matches · 184W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history317 matches
W
2026-10-29 · MAC Pettit · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erich Yost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-24 · MAC Church Mixed 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Gault mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-18 · MAC Church Mixed 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Gault mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-11 · MAC Church Mixed 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chad Wolff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-10-04 · MAC Church Mixed 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Rogers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-01 · MAC Pettit · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Yost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · MAC Pettit · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Calbreath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-09-21 · MAC Pettit · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erich Yost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-09-10 · MAC Scott · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timea Harisova
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-06 · Belmont Beauties Bates · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Wolff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-05 · MAC Greenspoon · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Theresa Hughes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-02 · MAC Scott · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lidia Cousins
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
63.5%
47W–27L · 55.5% of games
3.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 50.6% of games
6.0
25%
2W–6L · 44.4% of games
6.5
40.6%
13W–19L · 45.8% of games
7.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.4% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 61% of games
3.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57% of games
3.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.4% of games
4.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.8% of games
6.0mixed
65%
26W–14L · 56% of games
6.5mixed
58.6%
17W–12L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
62.2%
28W–17L · 53.9% of games
7.5mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
141 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
71 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
7 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer