← Search

Jacob Sandweiss

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 144W–48L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history192 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Gibbons
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Papproth
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-10-18 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Gibbons
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-11 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Gibbons
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-5
W
2026-10-05 · STL/Hamilton/Mid-Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Tierney
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-04 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-27 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Smeet Merchant
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-21 · STL/Hamilton/Mid-Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Papproth
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Gibbons
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-31 · STL/Hamilton/Mid-Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Papproth
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · STL/Hamilton/Mid-Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacob Boling
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-10 · STL/Hamilton/Mid-Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Papproth
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 53% of games
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 55.7% of games
3.5
86.4%
19W–3L · 64.7% of games
4.0
77.5%
86W–25L · 58.1% of games
7.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 61.3% of games
8.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
37 matches
#1 Singles
18%
34 matches
#2 Singles
15%
29 matches
Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova